當前位置:首頁>案例中心>Essay代寫范文案例>Essay代寫范文-Duty to Parents

Essay代寫范文-Duty to Parents

發布時間:2021-05-07 15:11:58 閱讀:1658

案例簡介

  • 作者:致遠教育
  • 導讀:本文是一篇Essay代寫范文賞析,本文主要討論了對父母的責任。雖然最早的哲學家已經定義了一個人的道德義務,但成年人對父母的義務還沒有得到明確的解決。大多數人普遍認為孩子長大后必須照顧父母。
  • 字數:1473 字
  • 預計閱讀時間:4分鐘

案例詳情

本文是一篇Essay代寫范文賞析,題目為:Duty to Parents,本文主要討論了對父母的責任。雖然最早的哲學家已經定義了一個人的道德義務,但成年人對父母的義務還沒有得到明確的解決。大多數人普遍認為孩子長大后必須照顧父母。然而,這種信念正日益受到哲學家的挑戰。根據哲學家簡·英格利什的說法,父母和孩子之間的關系被重新定義為友誼。

父母與孩子 插圖

Although the earliest philosophers have defined a person's moral obligations, the obligations of adults to their parents have not yet been specifically resolved. Most people generally believe that children must take care of their parents when they grow up. However, this belief is increasingly being challenged by philosophers. According to the philosopher Jane English, the relationship between parents and children is redefined as friendship. As a result, parents are obliged only when the relationship between parents and children remains friendly. In this article, I will argue that the responsibility of adults to their parents is no stronger than the responsibility of friendship.

雖然最早的哲學家已經定義了一個人的道德義務,但成年人對父母的義務還沒有得到明確的解決。大多數人普遍認為孩子長大后必須照顧父母。然而,這種信念正日益受到哲學家的挑戰。根據哲學家簡·英格利什的說法,父母和孩子之間的關系被重新定義為友誼。因此,父母只有在親子關系保持友好時才有義務。在這篇文章中,我將論證成年人對父母的責任并不比友誼的責任更重。

For believers of traditional moral values, children are responsible to their parents because they are children who give them the gift of life. However, this belief is only based on social norms, not logical foundations. It is important to realize that there is no "debt" that adults owe their parents. According to English (148), when a person requests the help of another person, that person is obliged to return that person's help because these actions were initiated by him or her. However, when one person voluntarily does something for another person, the other person has no obligation to do something in return. Similarly, in the relationship between parents and children, the children did not ask their parents to give any "favors" to support them. Parents assumed this responsibility when deciding to give birth to a child. Therefore, there is no reason for parents to demand any return based on what they provide for their children, because it is always possible to refute the argument that "I did not ask for birth", and this argument is indeed valid. A little.

In addition to the proper relationship, English also puts forward the concept of "friendship" to define the proper relationship between adults and their parents. Although the sound of this theory may be outrageous to some people, the concept of friendship replaces "reward" with "reciprocity" (English, 149). When true friends do something for each other, the only consideration in their hearts is each other's happiness, not the other's expectation of being rewarded. This is because the existence of friendship has become the bond between them, so that they don't have to worry about going back and forth. This caring relationship between friends is very suitable for parents and their adult children. Comparing parenthood with friendship should never be regarded as a kind of degradation. When parents take care of their children out of love, they are not sympathetic. On the contrary, children who maintain a good relationship with their parents will naturally do something for their parents to improve their happiness. However, comparing this interrelationship with the idea of repayment is a degradation. Parental contact is never a favor to the child, but a promise of a special friendship, which is expected to last longer than any other friendship.

However, some philosophers, such as Christine Hoff-Sommers, believe that English theories will undermine the morality that unites society. Hoff-Summers accused the attacks on traditional family values as radical rather than liberal (43). Hoff-Sommers believes that many philosophers just put forward a theory that over generalizes the relationship between people, instead of fixing their models to take care of the special nature of the relationship between family members. Hof Sommers believes that the "most people's mind" is essential for determining how to write virtue, not the philosopher's theory (55). Since there is still a dominant belief in the responsibility of filial piety, filial piety should be practiced rather than abolished. Otherwise, society will face the danger of radicalization and instability. Therefore, more respect should be given to "common-sense views" regarding kinship and family relations. Over the years, the divorce rate has risen sharply, and the value of family values has become lower and lower (58). Hoff-Sommers believes that this kind of statistical data may be a sign of social disintegration, and social disintegration stems from attacks on traditional blood relations and family values. The disintegration of the family is more likely to cause the misfortune of children than ever before, and continues to affect children’s deviation from the value of the family, and ultimately leads to social divisions.

Although Hoff-Sommers emphasized the importance of the social environment rather than the natural environment, she ignored the fact that the social environment and common-sense beliefs continue to evolve over time. The relationship between parents and children in modern society should also develop over time. The ultimate goal is to promote social integration and the overall happiness of the public, and some philosophers who have attacked the traditional duty of filial piety have not violated this goal. Parents becoming friends like children will only increase the harmony of the family and the whole society. In addition, Hoff-Sommers' argument has failed to resolve the inability of countless parents. However, English theory effectively solves the moral problem, that is, if the relationship between children and their parents is not good, whether they should take care of their parents. In most cases, parents fail to provide a caring and caring environment for their children to grow up, and fail to maintain a friendly relationship with their children should also be blamed. For children, it is unreasonable to assume more filial responsibilities, because mutual assistance ends in friendship (English, 150).

In short, the relationship between parents and children in modern society should develop from the traditional beliefs of "favor" and even "ownership". Only by establishing a caring and mutual assistance relationship like between friends can the relationship between parents and children truly achieve sustainable development. By restricting adults’ obligations to their parents no stronger than their friends’ obligations, people emphasized the importance of love and care between humans, rather than mocking the debts owed. This will also save those children who have suffered because of their parents’ unfriendliness from being improperly accused of not supporting their parents.

總之,現代社會中的父母與兒童關系應該從傳統的“恩惠”甚至“所有權”的觀念發展。只有建立朋友之間這樣的關愛互助關系,才能真正實現父母與兒童的可持續發展。人們通過限制成年人對父母的義務,而不是嘲笑欠下的債務,而是強調了人與人之間的愛和關懷的重要性。這也將拯救那些因父母不友好而遭受苦難的兒童免受不當指控不贍養父母的情況。

以上就是本篇Essay代寫范文全部內容,歡迎閱讀,范文內容和格式僅供留學生參考學習,不得抄襲,如有Essay代寫需要,請聯系網站客服。

其他案例

911国产在线观看无码专区